1. | Useful tool in planning and exploring other options. |
2. | Helps with teaching and learning for students and patients. |
3. | Accuracy, efficiency, quality are all potential advantages. |
4. | Potential for improved functional outcome: planning for dental implants, dental rehabilitation, better occlusion, less TMJ dysfunction and improved mandibular strength and cosmetic outcome. |
5. | Potential for reducing operating room time. |
6. | Communication between team members can be facilitated by the technology. |
7. | Increase in surgeon confidence. |
8. | Initial cost of the setup of the technology is a disadvantage but can be outweighed by the longterm benefits. |
9. | Accessibility and availability of the resource is a disadvantage. |
10. | Time constraint is a disadvantage. This includes time to learn the technology, collaborate and plan each case and turnaround and production time between initial case planning and scheduled surgery. |
11. | There is minimal quantitative research available to prove the accuracy, benefits and functional outcome of the patients when digital surgical design and simulation is used. There is also a need for a cost benefit analysis. |
12. | Surgical design and simulation can bring more of a team approach. |
13. | Surgical design and simulation is not included in medical student training. |
14. | There is cultural resistance to the surgical design and simulation technology. |
15. | The field of surgical design and simulation is a work in progress. |