Table 1 Summary of results of all studies included in the meta-analyses
From: Effect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function: meta-analysis study
| Source (publication) | Study design | Follow-up (days) | Number of patients | Mean age (range) |
HIT + RE |
Caloric + RE | VEMP + RE | DHI+ RE | CDP + RE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abramides 2015 [18], Sao Paolo, Brazil | Prospective study | 120 | 24 | 42 (12–65) |
Yes P = 0.414 | ||||
| Basta 2008 [12] Berlin, Germany | Prospective study | 42 | 18 | (10–75) |
Yes ND (NS) |
Yes ND (NS) |
Yes P < 0.05 |
Yes ND (NS) | |
| Bateucas 2015 [8] Salamanca, Spain | Prospective descriptive | 2 | 30 | 54 ± 10 | Yes | Yes | |||
| Bonucci 2008 [15] Sao Paolo, Brazil | NI* | NI* | 38 |
30.65 ± 32 4–62 |
Yes ND | ||||
| Brey 1995 [14] Mayo clinic,Rochester, Minnesota | NI* | 45 to 1770 | 52 | 3-87 |
Yes P = 0.01 |
Yes ND | |||
| Buchman 2004 [3] University of North Carolina, USA | Prospectivestudy | 30 | 67 | 2-87 |
Yes ND |
Yes ND | |||
| Coordes 2012 [13] Berlin, Germany | Prospective study | NI* | 17 | 60 (20–73) |
Yes ND | ||||
| Ernst 2006 [30] Berlin, Germany | Prospective study | 365 | 18 | 18-62 |
Yes ND (NS) | ||||
| Ito 1998 [31] Otsu, Japan | NI* | 30 | 55 | >18 |
Yes ND | ||||
| Jutila 2012 [32] Helsinki, Finland | Prospective study | 60 | 44 | 55 (30–76) |
Yes P > 0.05 | ||||
| Katsiari 2013 [2] Piraeus, Greece | Prospective study | 30 | 20 |
47.6 ± 20.2 10–77 |
Yes P = 0.01 |
Yes P = 0.002 | |||
| Kiyomizu 2000 [33] Miyazaki, Japan | NI* | NI* | 23 | 36-75 |
Yes ND | ||||
| Kluenter 2009 [6] Fena, Germany | Prospective study | 42 31–368) | 52 | 47(11–74) |
Yes ND | ||||
| Kluenter 2010 [25] Fena, Germany | Prospective study | 44 (31–363) | 24 | 51 (20–75) |
Yes ND | ||||
| Krause 2009a [22] Munich, Germany | Prospective study | 28 - 42 | 59 | 54 (15–83) |
Yes P < 0.001 | ||||
| Krause 2009b [23] Munich, Germany | Prospectivestudy | 28 | 47 | 54 (16–83) |
Yes P < 0.01 | ||||
| Krause 2010 [24] Munich, Germany | Prospectivestudy | 60 | 32 | 55 (15–83) |
Yes P < 0.001 |
Yes P < 0.047 | |||
| Louza 2015 [34] Munich, Germany | Retrospective observational study | 28 - 42 | 41 |
>14 56 ± 19 |
Yes ND |
Yes ND | |||
| Melvin 2009 [5] Johns Hopkins, Maryland, USA | Prospective cohort | 28 - 42 | 16 |
46 (23–69) |
Yes ND |
Yes ND |
Yes ND | ||
| Migliaccio 2005 [10] Johns Hopkins, Maryland, USA | Prospective study | 28 - 42 | 16 | 46 (27–64) |
Yes P > 0.05 | ||||
| Nordfalk 2014 [21] Oslo, Norway | Prospective pilot | 28 - 42 | 12 | 32-61 |
Yes ND | ||||
|
Nordfalk 2015 [19] Oslo, Norway | Prospective | 42-56 | 39 |
57.5 ± 17.2 (18–83) |
Yes ND |
Yes ND | |||
| Robard 2015 [11] Caen, France | Prospective study | 150 | 34 |
49 ± 25 (1–86) |
Yes P = 0.0015 | ||||
| Rossi 1998 [35] Turin, Italy | Case series | 180 | 32 | 12-74 |
Yes ND | ||||
| Todt 2008 [36] Berlin, Germany | Retrospective cohort | 42 - 56 | 62 | 17-84 |
Yes ND |
Yes ND | |||
| Vankatova 2014 [9] Geneve, Switzerland | Retrospective study | NI* | 50 | 15-72 |
Yes ND |
Yes ND | |||
| Wagner 2010 [17] Berlin, Germany | Retrospective cohort | 42 - 56 | 20 | 41.5 (11–58) |
Yes ND |
Yes ND |