Table 2 Individual study results, graft take rates and complication rates for cartilage palisade tympanoplasty compared to temporalis fascia
From: The palisade cartilage tympanoplasty technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors | Palisade | Temporalis fascia | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Patients | Overall take rate | Complications | Type of Complications | Number of Patients | Overall take rate | Complications | Types of Complications | |
Khan et al. [14] | 223 | 97.8% | 10.0% | Persistent or recurrent perforation, otorrhea, infection | 167 | 82.6% | 17.3% | Persistent or recurrent perforation |
Kazikdas et al. [12] | 23 | 95.7% | 8.7% | Perforation, otorrhea | 28 | 75.0% | 17.4% | Persistent or recurrent perforation |
Shishegar et al. [15] | 27 | 100.0% | 4.3% | Infection, otorrhea | 27 | 93.0% | 25.0% | Persistent or recurrent perforation |
Vashishth et al. [17] | 30 | 90.0% | 0.0% | 60 | 83.3% | 18% | Persistent or recurrent perforation, otorrhea, infection | |
Demirpehlivan et al.[16] | 19 | 79.0% | 10.0% | Persistent or recurrent perforation, infection | 67 | 80.6% | 16.7% | Persistent or recurrent perforation |
Weighted average (SE) | 96.0% (1.1%) | 3.1% (1.0%) | Weighted average (SE) | 82.5% (2.0%) | 17.9% (2.1%) | |||