Skip to main content

Table 5 Literature review detailing clinical outcomes of adjuvant post-operative therapy of oral tongue carcinoma. This study’s results (under Ianosvky et al) compares favorably with previously published reports

From: The role of brachytherapy for margin control in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Paper

TNM

Patient number

Follow up, median (months)

Treatment

OS

DSS

DFS

Local control

Complications - Acute

Complications - Late

Primary Surgery + Adjuvant BRTx for + ve or Close Margins

Lapeyre et al 2004 [16]

T1–4, N0–3, M0a

82

69 (mean)

BRTxb ± EBRTx

68% (5 yr)

80% (5 yr)

 

81% (2 yr)

 

43%

Grade 1: 12

Grade 2: 17

Grade 3: 8

Ayukawa et al 2007 [10]

T1–2, N0, M0

28

72

BRTxb

 

96% (5 yr)

92% (5 yr)

  

8% Grade 1 + 2

Petera at al 2015 [13]

T1–3, N0, M0

30

40 (mean)

BRTx

73% (3 yrs)

 

65.4% (3 yrs)

85.4% (3 yrs)

All Grade 2

1 ORN

2 Soft tissue necrosis

Goineau et al 2015 [9]

T1–2, N0–3c

112

80.4

BRTx ± EBRTx neck ± CTx

72% (2 yrs)

56% (5 yrs)

81% (2 yrs)

67% (5 yrs)

 

79% (2 yrs)

76% (5 yrs)

All grade ≥ 2 mucositis 12% infection requiring ABx.

22% grade ≥ 2 tongue necrosis requiring surgery.

8% pain requiring narcotics

Ianovski et al 2020

T1–3,N0–3, M0

55

25.4

BRTx ± EBRTx neck ± CTx

75.6% (3 yrs)

59.1% (5 yrs)

82.3% (3 yrs)

68.6% (5 yrs)

74.3% (3 yrs)

86.3% (3 yrs)

1 haemorrhage (Grade 4)

5% grade 2 pain requiring narcotics

Primary BRTx ± ND ± EBRTx ± CTx ± Intralesional CTxd

Urashima et al 2007 [17]

T1–2, N0, M0

409

 

BRTx ± EBRTx ± CTx ± intralesional

72.2–82.3% (5 yrs)

 

56–64.6% (5 yrs)

86–97% (5 yrs)

 

19.8% ulcer, 6.6% ORN

Bhalavat et al 2009 [14]

T1–2, N0, M0

57

64

BRTx ± EBRTx

67% (5 yrs)

 

51% (5 yrs)

59.7% (5 yrs)

BRTx: 47% grade III mucositis. 1 haemorrhage

BRTx + EBRTx: 60% grade II, 10% grade III mucositis + skin toxicity

14% submental fibrosis

12.3% soft tissue necrosis

2 ORN

Akiyama et al 2012 [18]

T1–2, N0, M0

51

45

BRTx

88% (2 yrs)

  

88% (2 yrs)

 

9% soft tissue ulcers

9% bone exposure

Matsumoto et al 2013 [19]

T1–2, N0, M0

67

58.6

BRTx ± EBRTx ± CTx ± intralesional

88.7% (5 yrs)

92.1% (5 yrs)

76% (5 yrs)

94% (5 yrs)

 

15% grade 3

+  7% grade 2mucositis

Bansal et al 2016 [20]

T1–2, N0, M0

62

53.5

BRTx ± EBRTx/ND to neck

78.8% (5 yrs)

 

59.3% (5 yrs)

68.2% (5 yrs)

 

32.9%:

pain +trismus 4.3%, ankyloglossia 7.6%,

ORN 1.1%, induration 13.1%

Primary Surgery ± EBRTx ± CTx

Ling et al 2013 [21]

T1–4, N0–3

210

36.6

Sx +/− EBRTx +/− CTx

44.4% (5 yr)

47.7% (5 yr)

    

Okuyemi et al 2014 [22]

T0–4, N0–3

166

 

Sx +/− EBRTx +/−? CTx

70.4% (2 yrs)

57.7% (5 yrs)

84.1% (2 yrs)

78% (5 yrs)

    

Mroueh et al 2017 [23]

T1–4, N0–3

325

43 (mean)

Sx +/− EBRTx +/− CTx

61% (5 yrs)

76% (5 yrs)

65% (5 yrs)

   

Liao et all 2017 [24]

T1–4, N0–3

8509

 

Sx +/− RTx +/− CTx

69% (5 yr)

77% (5 yr)

    

Zhang et al 2017 [25]

T1–4, N0–3

457

39

Sx +/− RTx +/− CTx

  

68–74.6% (3 yr)

33.1–64.8% (5 yr)α

   
  1. a Oral tongue + Floor of mouth subsites
  2. b Low Dose BRTx
  3. c 70% primary tumours, 15% recurrent, 17% 2nd primary
  4. d variable BRTx protocols: including both Low Dose and High Dose Rate treatments, various isotopes (Ra226, Ir192, Au198, Rn222, Cs137), a wide range of dosage (40–70 Gy) and fractionation methods, catheters placed in single and dual planes. Variable rates of surgical management of the neck, and different CTx medications
  5. α grouped into 3 age groups (Young: ≤30, Middle: 46–59, Older: ≥70 years of age)
  6. OS Overall Survival, DSS Disease Specific Survival, DFS Disease Free Survival, ABx Antibiotics, BRTx Brachytherapy, EBRTx External beam radiotherapy, CTx Chemotherapy, RTx Radiotherapy, ORN Osteoradionecrosis, RTOG Radiation Therapy Oncology Group