Skip to main content

Table 5 Predictive values for surgical success

From: Can drug-induced sleep endoscopy improve the success rates of tongue base surgery?

 

MM group

DISE group

Surgical success (n = 20)

Surgical failure (n = 27)

P - value

Surgical success (n = 22)

Surgical failure (n = 26)

P -value

Sex, male (%)

15 (75%)

25 (92.6%)

0.094

20 (90.1%)

22 (84.6%)

0.511

Age

43.7 ± 11.2

44.8 ± 13.0

0.768

38.5 ± 10.4

44.5 ± 13.2

0.090

BMI

25.4 ± 2.8

25.5 ± 3.4

0.852

26.3 ± 3.5

26.3 ± 3.0

0.958

NC

40.1 ± 12.9

37.7 ± 2.5

0.371

39.0 ± 2.7

38.7 ± 3.2

0.703

W/H ratio

0.91 ± 0.06

0.92 ± 0.07

0.649

0.88 ± 0.07

0.92 ± 0.05

0.018*

Tonsil grade

1.9 ± 0.8

1.2 ± 0.7

0.004**

2.1 ± 0.9

1.6 ± 0.8

0.042*

MMP

3.0 ± 0.8

2.9 ± 0.7

0.670

3.1 ± 0.6

2.9 ± 0.9

0.583

Friedman staging

2.5 ± 0.8

2.8 ± 0.4

0.343

2.2 ± 0.6

2.4 ± 0.8

0.486

AHI

37.9 ± 2.4

41.0 ± 17.8

0.581

53.2 ± 21.7

43.7 ± 19.2

0.115

Supine AHI

53.6 ± 24.0

53.7 ± 21.4

0.996

66.0 ± 19.2

58.7 ± 23.0

0.259

AHINREM

37.0 ± 19.0

41.9 ± 19.2

0.405

55.4 ± 22.7

45.0 ± 21.1

0.115

AHIREM

37.5 ± 29.2

33.4 ± 21.4

0.603

53.7 ± 25.3

46.8 ± 24.8

0.378

Nadir O2 sat, (%)

81.4 ± 4.8

79.4 ± 8.2

0.294

77.1 ± 8.7

78.3 ± 9.5

0.632

ESS

9.7 ± 5.1

9.4 ± 4.8

0.850

8.5 ± 5.2

7.8 ± 5.2

0.682

Nasopharyngoscopic evaluation a

V

1.8 ± 0.6

1.5 ± 0.5

0.143

2.0 ± 0.0

1.9 ± 0.3

0.161

O

1.2 ± 0.6

0.9 ± 0.5

0.031*

1.5 ± 0.7

1.4 ± 0.8

0.596

T

1.1 ± 0.5

0.8 ± 0.6

0.112

1.5 ± 0.5

1.6 ± 0.5

0.275

E

0.1 ± 0.3

0.04 ± 0.2

0.394

0.4 ± 0.7

0.2 ± 0.5

0.186

Nasal surgery, n (%)

11 (55.0%)

19 (70.3%)

0.278

11 (50%)

11 (42.3%)

0.594

  1. Abbreviations: MM Muller’s maneuver, DISE Drug-induced sleep endoscopy, BMI Body mass index, NC Neck circumference, W/H ratio Waist/hip ratio, MMP Modified Mallampati grade, AHI Apnea-hypopnea index, NREM Non-rapid eye movement sleep, REM Rapid eye movement sleep, Nadir O2sat Nadir O2 saturation, ESS Epworth sleepiness scale, V Velum, O Oropharynx lateral wall, T Tongue base, E Epiglottis
  2. * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; statistical analyses were performed by independent t-test
  3. a Scoring occlusion level was represented according to the surgical decision methods for each group; by MM for MM group and by DISE for DISE group
Back to article page

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery

ISSN: 1916-0216

Contact us