Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of network rank test of the intraoperative estimated blood loss outcome

From: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Study and rank

Surgical technique for adenoidectomy

1st Best

A

B

C

D

E

F

0.6

29.6

27.2

0.0

9.5

33.1

2nd

7.3

31.0

25.3

0.0

11.3

25.1

3rd

25.4

22.5

19.3

0.2

15.7

16.9

4th

46.5

9.0

14.6

0.4

18.2

11.3

5th

20.2

7.6

13.1

3.2

42.8

13.1

Worst

0.0

0.3

0.5

96.2

2.5

0.5

Mean rank

3.8

2.3

2.6

6.0

3.8

2.5

SUCRA

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.0

0.4

0.7

  1. A: Conventional Curette adenoidectomy, B: Suction diathermy, C: Endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy, D: Endoscopic assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy, E: Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy (transnasal forceps), F: Electronic molecular resonance adenoidectomy EMRA (suction electrocautery). SUCRA: The surface under the cumulative ranking curve