Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Table 3 Results of network rank test of the estimated procedure time outcome

Study and rank	Surgical technique for adenoidectomy
1st Best	A	B	C	D	E	F
1st Best	3.3	14.2	11.7	1.6	15.4	53.8
2nd	19.7	17.7	25.7	4.2	17.3	15.4
3rd	37.8	16.2	18.6	8.6	9.8	9.0
4th	27.3	19.0	18.7	14.7	12.1	8.2
5th	10.1	18.2	19.4	27.7	18.0	6.6
Worst	1.8	14.7	5.9	43.2	27.4	7.0
Mean Rank	3.3	3.5	3.3	4.9	3.8	2.2
SUCRA	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.2	0.4	0.8

A: Conventional Curette adenoidectomy, B: Suction diathermy, C: Endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy, D: Endoscopic assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy, E: Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy (transnasal forceps), F: Electronic molecular resonance adenoidectomy EMRA (suction electrocautery). SUCRA: The surface under the cumulative ranking curve

ISSN: 1916-0216