Skip to main content

Table 4 Qualitative synthesis for other uncommon outcomes (n = 17)

From: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Study name

Year

Findings for other outcomes

Shorook Na'ara et al

2020

Change in the paediatric sleep questionairre was noted as primar outcome, which improved to a greater extent in the intevention group (+ 0.31 points) than contorl group (+ 0.22 points) with a P-value of 0.009. Adenoid size was 3.12 in the intervention arm and 3.2 in the control arm (P:0.6)

Secaattin Gu ̈ls et al

2019

There was significant difference in the pain socre between two groups at first (P: < 0.002) and second post-operative days (P: < 0.003)

Saroo Singh et al

2019

The mean recovery time in the intervention group was 36 h with SD of 12.205, while it was 33.60 with SD of 11.95 in the contorl group with a P-value of 0.445. Postopertaive pain was higher significantly in control group than intervention arm

Juneja et al

2018

There was a higher post-opertaive pain score in the control group (6.20: 3 to 8) when compared with 4.24 (2 to 8) in the intervention group (P < 0.05)

Mularczyk et al

2018

Mean duration of pain was higher in the intervention (2.05 ± 1.12) than control group (1.53 ± 1.03), however, there was no statistically significant difference in the pain between two groups after controlling for adenoid size ((P:0.87)

Hussein and Al-Juboori

2012

No additional outcome was reported

Baker et al

2012

The mean number of handbacks per surgery was 1.9 and this average was 0.4 in the intervention group than control group (3.4) with a P-value of < 0.0001

Öztürket al

2012

Parents graded nasal airway obstruction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. The VAS score improved among those who underwent curretage as well as power-asssisted endoscopic adenoidectomy. VAS score in the control arm improved from 8.63 to 2.22 after 6 months and it improved from 8.69 to 2.08 in the intervention arm. There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS between two groups (P:0.46). There was a significant reduction in the adenoid size in the intervention than control arm (P < 0.0001)

7.5% of the patients had laryngospasm and delayed anesthetical recovery. No recurrences were found in both groups at the follow-up

Bradoo et al

2011

No complications such as velopharyngeal insufficiency or post-opertaive bleeding were observed in either of the groups

Songu et al

2010

No significant difference was found in symptoms between two groups (P = 0.422). Symptoms were resolved in 61% of the petients in control group and 70% in the intervention group. Around 90% of the patients’s symptoms were resolved or improved in both groups

Datta et al

2009

The mean pain score was 2.63 (1.64–3.63) in control group whereas intervention group’s mean score was 2.13 (1.19 to 3.06) with no statistically significant difference. The mean recovery period in intervention group was 2.93 days and it was slightly prolonged (3.5 days) in the control group (P < 0.05)

Al-Mazrou et al

2009

28.5% of the pateints were founds to have injury of adjacent structures in the control arm versus 11.5% had injured structures in the control arm

Jonas et al

2007

Mean size of the adenoids was 1.5 ± 0.75 in the intervention group and 1.9 ± 0.82 in the control group at 6 months

Shapiro et al

2007

There was no statisitcally significnat difference in the pain scores between two groups after surgery (P:0.296) and no difference in the use of narcotic pain medication between two groups (P:0.982). Patients were returned to normal diets on similar post-opertaive days (P:0.982) and caregivers returned to normal routine on similar post-operative days (P:0.631)

Tarantino et al

2004

Complete cicatrization (complete absence of pseudomembrane) was met by 92% of the patients in intervention gropu versus 45.3% of the patients in the control group (P < 0.0001)

Stanislaw et al

2000

Intervnetion was 20% quicker and had 27% less blood loss than currete and provided better control for depth of resection with complete resection. Surgeons were greately satisfied with intervention than currete (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the recovery period or satisfaction of parents

Clemens et al

1997

No postopertaive complications were recorded in either of the groups