Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of cases and controls who did and did not undergo revision surgery

From: Endoscopic sinus surgery outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and immunoglobulin deficiencies

 

Revision surgery (Cases) (N = 4)

No revision surgery (Cases) (N = 9)

Revision surgery (Controls) (N = 3)

No Revision surgery (Controls) (N = 23)

Male (n, %)

2 (50)

3 (33)

1 (33)

8 (35)

Age (mean ± SD)

34.8 ± 8.6

48.4 ± 15.9

45.3 ± 20.0

43.4 ± 13.3

Asthma (n, %)

2 (50)

4 (44)

1 (33)

11 (48)

CRSwNP (n, %)

4 (100)

4 (44)

2 (67)

14

CRSsNP (n, %)

0 (0)

5 (56)

1 (33)

9

Preoperative LMS (mean ± SD)

14 ± 2.2

13.7 ± 3.4

13.3 ± 6.1

12.7 ± 2.9

Complete ESSa (%)

4 (100)

7 (78)

3 (100)

22

Limited ESSb (%)

0 (0)

2 (22)

0 (0)

1

  1. SD standard deviation, ESS endoscopic sinus surgery, LMS Lund Mackay score, CRSsNP chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps, CRSwNP chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
  2. aComplete ESS was defined as maxillary antrostomies, total ethmoidectomies, sphenoidotomies, frontal sinusotomies, and nasal polypectomies if polyps are present
  3. bLimited ESS was defined as any ESS that did not fit the definition of complete ESS