Open Access

Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma (SNUC): the Alberta experience and literature review

  • Caroline C Xu1Email author,
  • Peter T Dziegielewski1,
  • William T McGaw2, 3 and
  • Hadi Seikaly1
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery201342:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-42-2

Received: 29 November 2012

Accepted: 25 December 2012

Published: 31 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare malignancy with often dismal outcomes. This study set to determine provincial and literature-wide survival outcomes based on treatment modality.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of all SNUC patients in the province of Alberta from 1986–2010 was conducted. A review of the literature of SNUC patients was also performed. Patient/tumor characteristics, treatment, and follow-up/survival data were collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses were performed.

Results

20 patients were treated for SNUC in Alberta and 140 patients were identified in the literature. Pooled median disease-free survival was 12. 7 months and 5-year survival estimate was 6.25%. Cox-Regression analysis demonstrated an overall survival advantage with multimodality treatments (Log-Rank test: p = 0.015). However, no statistically significant differences in disease-free and overall survival were identified between patients treated with chemoradiation or surgery followed by adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

Treatment of SNUC remains challenging with poor survival outcomes. There appears to be no statistically significant difference in overall, or disease-free survival between treatment modalities.

Introduction

Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare, highly aggressive and clinico-pathologically distinctive carcinoma of uncertain histogenesis [1]. The disease affects males more often than females and has a broad age range [2]. SNUC presents as a rapidly enlarging tumour arising from the sinonasal tract with initially vague symptoms [3] that are of relatively short duration. Orbital, dural, and intracranial invasion are common [2, 4] at presentation.

Pathological examination of SNUC typically reveals large tumours with fungating and poorly defined margins that invade adjacent structures [1]. The histologic appearance is characterized by sheets, trabecular, and ribbon-like arrangements of small to medium-size undifferentiated cells. These cells often have high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, high mitotic rate, and prominent tumour necrosis [3]. Lymphovascular and neural invasion are often also identified [3]. Immuno-histochemical antigenic profiles vary widely [3], however, features of neuroectodermal differentiation are typically absent [5].

The majority of patients present with advanced stage disease and often undergo intense, multi-modality treatment [6]. Unfortunately, survival remains poor [1, 2, 7, 8]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes based on treatment of SNUC patients in Alberta and the literature at large.

Methods

Ethics approval was granted by the University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board (HREB) committee as well as the Alberta Cancer Board. The study was conducted at a tertiary care academic referral centre.

Provincial chart review

A systematic, retrospective medical record review was performed. All patients diagnosed with SNUC in the province of Alberta from 1986–2010 were identified in the Alberta Cancer Registry [9], which is a certified member of the North American Association for Central Cancer Registries. Charts and electronic medical records for all identified patients were then accessed and cross-referenced to confirm suspected diagnoses of SNUC. Tumors of all patients were then pulled from a tumor bank and analyzed by a single head and neck pathologist (WTM). Any tumors with questionable pathology reports were also obtained and analyzed. The following criteria were then applied to these patients:

Inclusion Criteria:
  1. 1)

    Histological diagnosis of SNUC

     
  2. 2)

    Treatment within Alberta

     
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. 1)

    Non-SNUC tumor

     
  2. 2)

    Incomplete data

     

Medical records were then gleaned for: patient, tumor and treatment characteristics as well as follow-up time, survival status, and disease-free status as of March 30th, 2010. Patient age was recorded as the age on the first day of primary treatment. Clinical TNM staging was obtained from multi-disciplinary tumor board notes, which followed the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines [10]. Overall survival was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to death. Disease-free survival was defined as the first day of treatment to disease recurrence.

Literature review

A literature review was undertaken in a systematic fashion using: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, and Scopus. The goal was to identify papers describing the survival of SNUC as per treatment modality. Three reviewers searched for the following terms: “sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma”, “SNUC”, “undifferentiated carcinoma”, and “paranasal sinuses”. Foreign language studies were included in the search strategy and only excluded from the review if an English translation was not available. Bibliographies were also checked for relevant publications. Abstracts of publications were screened for possible inclusion (as per above criteria) and relevant articles were reviewed in full. Studies were excluded if survival time and status at last follow-up were not provided. Each study was evaluated for gender and age of the patient in the study, presenting symptoms, orbital involvement, treatment strategy, and follow-up. Where AJCC staging was not provided, the Kadish staging was converted to an AJCC TMN stage based on information provided.

Statistical analysis

Actuarial survival for pooled patients was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis to account for censored data. A log rank test was used to compare survival curves with statistical significance set as p<0.05. Cox-regression analysis was also performed. Covariate factors known to influence survival including age, gender and tumor stage were incorporated as potential confounding variables. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

20 histologically confirmed cases of SNUC were identified in Alberta. The majority of patients were male, middle-aged, and presenting with Stage IV disease (Table 1). Patients presented with headache or neurologic symptoms (45%), nasal obstruction (40%), epistaxis (25%) and occasionally, facial pain (5%). In many patients, the exact tumour origin within the sinonasal tract was difficult to determine due to the extensive nature of their tumours on pre-operative imaging.
Table 1

Baseline variables of SNUC patients in Alberta

Variable

 

Total Number (%)

Patients

20

Males

 

16 (80)

Females

 

4 (20)

Mean age at diagnosis, years (range)

 

53.9 (35–85)

Mean follow-up time, months

 

21

Stage at presentation

Stage IV

17 (85)

 

Stage III

2 (10)

 

Stage II

1 (5)

Tumor origin site

Sinonasal – not otherwise specified

7 (35)

 

Nasal cavity

4 (20)

 

Maxillary sinus

4 (20)

 

Ethmoid sinus

5 (25)

Systematic review and pooled analysis

42 potential articles were identified through a systematic and comprehensive search. 26 articles met study criteria and yielded 140 patients available for survival analysis (Table 2). Patients in the literature presented with symptoms of nasal obstruction (20.0%), epistaxis (17.1%), diplopia or other visual symptoms (15.0%), or headache (12.1%). Rarely, patients also presented with facial pain (7.1%) or sinusitis (2.9%). At presentation, 42.9% of patients had orbital involvement. AJCC TNM staging was available for 128 (87.6%) of the patients with the majority comprising of Stage IV disease (Table 2).
Table 2

Patient demographics of SNUC patients in the literature

Variables

 

Number of patients (%)

Patients

140

Males

 

107 (76.4)

Females

33 (23.6)

Mean age, years (range)

 

52.5 (8-84)

TNM Stage

Stage IV

102 (72.9)

 

Stage III

15 (10.7)

 

Stage II

11 (7.9)

 

Not Stated

12 (12.4)

Mean follow-up time, months

 

22

The majority of patients in the literature (66.4%) received multimodality therapy (Table 3). Where recurrence data was available (107 patients), the recurrence rate was 42.3% with time to recurrence ranging from 3–33 months. 32.1% of patients died of local disease while 14.3% of patients died of metastatic disease. The most common sites of metastasis were bone (10.2%), cervical lymph node (9.5%), lung (5.8%), brain (5.8%), and liver (4.4%). The pooled median disease-free survival was 12.7 months. The 1, 3 and 5-year survival estimates were 51.2%, 19.4% and 6.25% respectively. The median overall survival was 12.7 months.
Table 3

Treatments received by SNUC patients

    Modality

Number of patients (%)

 

Alberta

Literature

No treatment

2 (10)

5 (4)

Single modality

7 (35)

42 (30)

Chemoradiation

4 (20)

37 (26)

Surgery + Adjuvant radiotherapy

3 (15)

22 (16)

Surgery + Chemoradiation

4 (20)

34 (24)

Only two patients in Alberta received no treatment (Table 3): one died days after presenting with a brain abscess and another patient opted for no treatment. The remainder of patients received either a single or multi-modality approach. In nine of the 20 patients, metastasis was detected within an average of 12.7 months (standard deviation of 33.2 months, range: 2.6 months to 3.7 years). The mean time from recurrence to death was 4.9 months (standard deviation of 3.2 months, range: 1.0 to 7.8 months). Seventeen patients (85%) died of their disease while the remaining patients died of respiratory failure and/or aspiration pneumonia.

A statistical difference in overall survival of pooled patients was found between patients treated with single versus multi-modality approach (Figure 1). However, this did not translate to a difference in disease-free survival (Figure 2). There were no differences in overall and disease-free survival based on initial treatment, with Cox regression analysis to account for covariables such as age, sex, and stage (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meir plot depicting overall survival by treatment modality.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meir plot depicting disease-free survival by treatment modality.

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meir plot depicting overall survival by single versus multi-modality approaches.

Figure 4

Kaplan-Meir plot depicting disease-free survival by single versus multi-modality approaches.

Discussion

Rare sinonasal tumours are challenging clinical entities for head and neck oncology and skull base surgeons [1113]. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma is a particularly difficult to treat.

We described the results of a series of 20 patients with SNUC treated between 1986 and 2010 in Alberta. As consistent with previous studies [4, 1419], the majority of these patients presented with locally advanced disease. At the senior author’s institution, patients with resectable tumours are offered surgery followed by chemoradiation. Chemotherapy agents used included carboplatin, cisplatin, and etoposide. Surgical resection typically involved extensive craniofacial resection with maxillectomy, orbital exenteration, and occasionally, neurosurgical involvement. Overall, outcomes of these patients were typical of those depicted in the literature: patients had high rates of recurrence, metastatic disease, and had very limited disease-free survival.

Kramer et al. [15] presented a case series and systematic review of 60 patients with SNUC in the literature in 2004. More recently, Reiersen et al. also presented a systematic review of patients in the literature [20]. Their study had similar findings of overall poor prognosis. However, the study authors proposed that treatment of SNUC patients should include surgery with adjuvant therapy. This is based on findings that surgery was the best initial modality and the addition of chemotherapy and radiation provided additional survival benefits. Our results also suggest that a multi-modality approach confers an overall survival advantage. However, our results failed to show a significant advantage of surgical-based treatment stategies and there appears to be no clear disease-free survival advantage with any particular modality, based on our results.

Our study has several limitations. First, this is a review and pooled analysis of an area of the literature comprised entirely of small to medium-sized case series. The data is heterogeneous and the quality is often poor. AJCC staging information was not available for all patients and often the Kadish staging system was necessarily converted to an AJCC stage based on available information regarding anatomic involvement. Firm conclusions are difficult to make due to the lack of statistical power, reporting bias, and heterogeneity of clinical characteristics and treatment modalities. However, this study confirms that despite advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the cure-rate for SNUC remains dismally low. Recurrence rate is very high and many patients died of disease within months of diagnosis.

Given the challenges and limited success in the treatment of SNUC, alternative therapeutic modalities are clearly necessary. Novel therapies that have been attempted include boron neutron capture therapy [21], autologous bone marrow transplant [22], and neoadjuvant selective intra-arterial cisplatin with concurrent radiation therapy [23], both of which showed limited success. A recent histo-biochemical study of a small series of SNUC patients showed that these tumours have a strong expression c-KIT, which is a tyrosine kinase receptor typically expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumours [24]. However, over-expression was not due to an activating mutation in the c-kit gene, and thus, the authors argued that use of TK-inhibitors targeting c-KIT (e.g. Imatinib/Gleevac) may not prove successful. However, this represents a possible new avenue of therapy.

Conclusions

SNUC is a unique clinico-pathologic entity that remains a challenge to treat despite aggressive multidisciplinary approaches. There is no evidence that aggressive surgery and post-operative RT offer any survival advantage compared to other modalities. Therefore, a search for alternative therapies is warranted.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta
(2)
Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, University of Alberta
(3)
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta

References

  1. Wenig BM: Undifferentiated malignant neoplasms of the sinonasal tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009, 133 (5): 699-712. ReviewPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeng YM, Sung MT, Fang CL, et al.: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma and nasopharyngeal-type undifferentiated carcinoma: two clinically, biologically, and histopathologically distinct entities. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002, 26 (3): 371-376. 10.1097/00000478-200203000-00012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ejaz A, Wenig BM: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: clinical and pathologic features and a discussion on classification, cellular differentiation, and differential diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005, 12 (3): 134-143. 10.1097/01.pap.0000163958.29032.56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Musy PY, Reibel JF, Levine PA: Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma: The Search for a Better Outcome. Laryngoscope. 2002, 112.8 I: 1450-1455.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellizzi AM, Bourne TD, Mills SE, Stelow EB: The cytologic features of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008, 129 (3): 367-376. 10.1309/C00WN1HHJ9AMBJVT.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Enepekides DJ: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: an update. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005, 13 (4): 222-225. 10.1097/01.moo.0000172806.56382.eb. ReviewPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Levine PA, Frierson HF, Stewart FM, Mills SE, Fechner RE, Cantrell RW: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: a distinctive and highly aggressive neoplasm. Laryngoscope. 1987, 97 (8 Pt 1): 905-908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsch BD, Levine PA, Stewart FM, Frierson HF, Cantrell RW: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: a ray of hope. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993, 108 (6): 697-700.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Alberta Health Services: Cancer. 2011, Available at: http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/2171.asp (accessed January 30, 2012)Google Scholar
  10. Edge SB: AJCC cancer staging handbook: from the AJCC cancer staging manual. 2010, New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. Ali YH, Hussain AE: Adenomatoid odontogenic tumour of the middle turbinate: case report and literature review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009, 38 (1): E9-E13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Minton TJ, Goyal P: Endoscopic treatment of a maxillary sinus spindle cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009, 38 (2): E45-E50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu A, Thomas P, Franklin J, Rotenberg B: Endoscopic resection of pterygopalatine chondrosarcoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009, 38 (3): E100-E103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Miyamoto RC, Gleich LL, Biddinger PW, Gluckman JL: Esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: impact of histological grading and clinical staging on survival and prognosis. Laryngoscope. 2000, 110 (8): 1262-1265. 10.1097/00005537-200008000-00007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kramer D, Durham JS, Sheehan F, Thomson T: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: case series and systematic review of the literature. J Otolaryngol. 2004, 33 (1): 32-36. 10.2310/7070.2004.00032.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim BS, Vongtama R, Juillard G: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: case series and literature review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2004, 25 (3): 162-166. 10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.12.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Frierson HF, Mills SE, Fechner RE: Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma. An Aggressive Neoplasm Derived from Schneiderian Epithelium and Distinct from Olfactory Neuroblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1986, 10 (11): 771-779. 10.1097/00000478-198611000-00004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Righi PD, Francis F, Aron BS, Weitzner S, Wilson KM, Gluckman J: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: a 10-year experience. Am J Otolaryngol. 1996, 17 (3): 167-171. 10.1016/S0196-0709(96)90055-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tanzler ED, Morris CG, Orlando CA, Werning JW, Mendenhall WM: Management of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. Head Neck. 2008, 30 (5): 595-599. 10.1002/hed.20748.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Reiersen DA, Pahilan ME, Devaiah AK: Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes for Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  21. Kouri M, Kankaanranta L, Seppälä T, et al.: Undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma may respond to single-fraction boron neutron capture therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2004, 72 (1): 83-5. 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.03.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Madison Michael L, Sorenson JM, Samant S, Robertson JH: The treatment of advanced sinonasal malignancies with pre-operative intra-arterial cisplatin and concurrent radiation. J Neurooncol. 2005, 72 (1): 67-75. 10.1007/s11060-004-2712-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Stewart FM, Lazarus HM, Levine PA, Stewart KA, Tabbara IA, Spaulding CA: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous marrow transplantation for esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1989, 12 (3): 217-21. 10.1097/00000421-198906000-00008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chernock RD, Perry A, Pfeifer JD, Holden JA, Lewis JS: Receptor tyrosine kinases in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas–evaluation for EGFR, c-KIT, and HER2/neu expression. Head Neck. 2009, 31 (7): 919-27. 10.1002/hed.21061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement