Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Original research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

BRAF V600E mutation is associated with aggressive features in papillary thyroid carcinomas ≤ 1.5 cm

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery volume 50, Article number: 63 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

While some studies suggest that the BRAF V600E mutation correlates with a high-risk phenotype in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), more evidence is necessary before this mutation can be used to help guide decision making in the management of small thyroid nodules. This study investigated whether BRAF V600E mutation is associated with aggressive features in PTMC (≤ 1 cm) and small PTC (1–1.5 cm).

Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed on 121 patient cases. Patients who underwent thyroid surgery for PTMC (≤ 1 cm) or small PTC (1–1.5 cm) were included if molecular testing was done for BRAF V600E mutation. Two study groups were created based on tumour size: PTMC (n = 55) and small PTC (n = 66). The groups were analysed for the presence of a BRAF V600E mutation and aggressive features, including macroscopic extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node metastasis (LNM), and high-risk histological features (tall cell, columnar cell, hobnail, solid/trabecular, and diffuse sclerosing). The Fischer exact test was used to calculate statistical significance.

Results

BRAF V600E mutations were detected in 43.6% of PTMC and 42.4% of small PTC. Of the mutated PTMC nodules, 54.1% demonstrated aggressive characteristics as compared to 19.4% of the non-mutated PTMCs (p = 0.010). Of the mutated small PTC tumours, 82.1% had aggressive features. In contrast, 28.9% of the non-mutated small PTCs showed aggressive features (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate an association between a BRAF V600E mutation and aggressive features in PTMC (≤ 1 cm) and small PTC (1–1.5 cm). Therefore, determining the molecular status of these thyroid nodules for the presence of BRAF V600E can help guide patient management.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Thyroid cancer has become increasingly prevalent in North America, with an incidence in the United States of 13.7 cases per 100,000 in 2017 compared to only 4.9 cases per 100,000 in 1977 [1]. In 2019, thyroid cancer was the fifth most common malignancy diagnosed in women in Canada. It was the leading cancer diagnosed among the ages 15–29 [2]. The most common form of thyroid cancer is papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), making up approximately 80% of diagnoses [3, 4].The surge in documented cases can be attributed to recent advances in imaging modalities that can more accurately identify small nodules in the thyroid gland. As such, many thyroid nodules are discovered as incidental findings on imaging studies performed for other reasons [5].

Workup of a thyroid nodule includes laboratory testing, ultrasonography, and biopsy, if indicated. The main concern is to exclude malignancy [6]. There have been great improvements in thyroid ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) [7], resulting in an increase in papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMC), defined as PTC ≤ 1 cm [7]. In 1988–1989, only 25% of newly documented thyroid tumours were less than or equal to 1 cm, in comparison to 39% of the new thyroid cancer diagnoses in 2008–2009 [8]. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) recommends the use of FNA on thyroid nodules ≥ 1.5 cm in the presence of a low suspicion sonographic pattern and nodules ≥ 1 cm in the presence of intermediate or high suspicion patterns, effectively leading to active surveillance of smaller nodules [6, 9]. Currently, low risk biopsy-proven PTMC are thought to be indolent tumours that can be treated with surgical excision or active surveillance [6, 9]. A small subset of PTMC exhibits aggressive characteristics associated with true malignant behavior, including local and distant recurrences [10]. Identifying these tumours early on can improve the outcome. However, many of these aggressive features can only be identified post-operatively on histologic specimens.

Molecular testing is an additional tool that is being explored in thyroid cancer diagnostics to overcome this knowledge gap. Certain mutations have been linked to more aggressive tumour behaviour and molecular testing can assist in the interpretation of findings and the selection of an appropriate treatment plan [6]. The BRAF V600E mutation is the most commonly reported mutation in patients with PTC and PTMC [11]. The prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation varies significantly according to the histotype of PTC (30–90% of cases), being the highest in the tall cell variant of PTC (up to 95%) which is the most common aggressive variant of PTC. Activation of the wild type (wt) BRAF kinase is tightly regulated in the mitogen activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The valine to glutamate mutation in the 600th position (V600E) of the peptide sequence results in constitutive activation of the BRAF kinase, resulting in oncogenesis [12]. While there is some controversy on this topic, many studies have reported that PTC with mutated BRAF V600E is associated with a poorer prognosis [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Since BRAF V600E has been linked to aggressive behaviour in PTC, the goal of this study is to determine if the presence of BRAF V600E in PTMC and small PTC is predictive of aggressive disease that requires more aggressive treatment than active surveillance or thyroid lobectomy.

Materials and methods

Study design

This is a retrospective chart review of 121 patient charts performed at a McGill University teaching hospital in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The protocol was approved by the Medical-Bioethics Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Integrated Health and Social Services Network for West-Central Montreal. Data on baseline patient demographics and characteristics, preoperative FNAC results, molecular mutation testing, and postoperative pathology was collected.

Patient selection

Patients included in this study underwent a thyroid FNAC and subsequent surgery at our institution between 2017 and 2020. Charts were reviewed if the patient underwent thyroid surgery for PTMC (≤ 1 cm) or small PTC (1–1.5 cm) and molecular testing for BRAF V600E mutation was completed on these nodules. A limited ipsilateral central neck dissection was performed for all patients unless gross lymphadenopathy was visualized on pre-operative imaging or intraoperatively. In this case, a more formal central neck dissection was performed. The McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) was calculated for all patients. This scoring system was used as it is very diverse, incorporating patient demographics, physical examination, imaging, and cytologic features to predict risk of thyroid cancer in the nodule. Patients with benign tumours on final pathology or who had undergone molecular testing that did not test for BRAF V600E mutation were excluded.

Two study groups were created based on tumour size: PTMC and small PTC. The groups were analysed for the presence of BRAF V600E mutation and aggressive features. Experienced thyroid pathologists reviewed all samples and reported aggressive features. Aggressive features noted on postoperative pathology reports included: macroscopic extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node metastasis (LNM), and high-risk histological features (tall cell, columnar cell, hobnail/micropapillary, solid/trabecular, and diffuse sclerosing).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were performed. Fisher exact tests, t tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to calculate statistical significance between groups, using a threshold p < 0.05 to identify significant differences. These statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel. Relative risk calculations were performed using MedCalc software.

Results

A total of 121 patient charts fit the selection criteria and were included in this study. The 121 patients were subdivided into two study groups based on tumour size: PTMC (n = 55) and small PTC (n = 66). No statistically significant difference was detected between PTMC and small PTC with regards to age (p = 0.32), gender (p = 0.66), Bethesda diagnostic category (p = 0.87), or MTNS (p = 0.31).

All patients underwent preoperative molecular testing for BRAF V600E. In BRAF V600E mutated patients, there was a significantly higher MTNS (p < 0.001) and a significantly higher Bethesda score distribution (p < 0.001). These findings were consistent within the PTMC (p = 0.0042) and small PTC (p < 0.001) size groups. The baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Subdivided by size of tumour, the BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 43.6% of PTMCs and 42.4% of small PTCs. Of the mutated PTMC nodules, 54.2% demonstrated aggressive characteristics on final pathology as compared to 19.4% of the wild type PTMCs (p = 0.010). Of the mutated small PTC tumours, 82.1% had aggressive features. In contrast, 28.9% of the wild type small PTCs showed aggressive features (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC, ≤ 1 cm) and small papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, 1.1–1.5 cm) demonstrating aggressive tumour features, subdivided by BRAF V600E mutation status

Full size image

Aggressive features noted on final pathology are further characterized in Table 2. In the PTMC group, significant differences were detected with regards to having a tall cell variant (p = 0.031) and more than one aggressive feature (p = 0.012), with a maximum of two features in five tumours. In the small PTC group, significant differences were found among the occurrence of LNM (p = 0.0016), tall cell variants (p = 0.0011), and having more than one aggressive feature (p = 0.0034) on final pathology. Of the mutated small PTC tumours, six had two aggressive features and two had three aggressive features. One wild type PTC tumour had two aggressive features.

Table 2 Aggressive tumour features
Full size table

Risk ratios of displaying aggressive tumour features were calculated (Table 3). Overall, the risk ratio of having aggressive disease with a detected BRAF V600E mutation was 2.81 (CI 1.79–4.41, p < 0.001). When subdivided by size, the risk ratio was 2.84 (CI 1.25–6.27, p = 0.012) for PTMC and 2.84 (CI 1.67–4.81, p < 0.001) for small PTC.

Table 3 Relative risk of aggressive tumour features in BRAF V600E mutated papillary thyroid tumours
Full size table

Discussion

The role of BRAF kinase in oncogenesis has been widely established [12]. Constitutive activation of BRAF through mutagenesis upregulates the mitogen activating protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway resulting in cell proliferation [24]. BRAF V600E is the most common mutation in PTC and in PTMC [25,26,27]. Previous studies have described an association of BRAF V600E mutation with aggressive features of PTC, including macroscopic extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node metastasis (LNM), advanced stage, and disease recurrence [13,14,15,16,17, 21,22,23, 28]. In addition, the prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation is the highest in some aggressive histologic variants of PTC such as the tall cell variant (up to 95%) and the hobnail/micropapillary variant (70–80%). Currently, there is debate surrounding the implications of BRAF V600E on prognostic factors of PTMC, and whether BRAF V600E status should be used to guide management [9, 22, 29]. When taken in isolation, BRAF V600E has a low positive predictive value for detecting PTMC that will progress and spread outside of the thyroid. There is still limited data to indicate that any molecular findings, such as BRAF V600E mutation, should impact the suitability of a small PTC for active surveillance. However, some authors suggest that long-term active surveillance may not be a good alternative to surgery for patients with BRAF V600E-positive low-risk PTMC [22, 29]. The extensive Japanese, Korean, and more recent North American experiences have not used molecular markers as inclusion or exclusion criteria for active surveillance.

Guidelines on management of thyroid nodules have been set out by multiple organizations. The ATA recommends FNAC based on sonographic findings. A FNAC should be performed on nodules ≥ 1 cm in the presence of intermediate or high suspicion patterns and nodules ≥ 1.5 cm in the presence of a low suspicion sonographic pattern [6]. In general, if a FNAC is diagnostic for papillary thyroid malignancy, surgery is the recommended treatment. Recommendation #12 of the 2015 ATA guidelines proposes active surveillance as an alternative to immediate surgical excision in patients with a low-risk tumor (specifically citing PTMC with no high risk features as an example), comorbid patients with high surgical risk, patients with short remaining lifespans, or patients with other medical or surgical issues to address prior to thyroid surgery. This addition to the ATA guidelines is based on findings from two prospective studies in Japan that demonstrated disease specific mortality, loco-regional recurrence and distant recurrence rates similar to patients who underwent immediate surgery. As well, patients who eventually needed surgical excision did not suffer further negative consequences, suggesting that the delayed surgery did not affect the outcome [9, 30, 31]. Despite this evidence from Japan, active surveillance is not often implemented in North America. This may be because physicians and patients alike are uncomfortable as there are patients within this low-risk PTMC group that develop loco-regional or distant metastases [32]. There are no clinical or radiological features that can consistently identify the minority of PTMC patients who will have significant progression.

If surgery is selected to treat PTMC, the ATA recommends lobectomy for low-risk nodules (no ETE, LNM, prior irradiation, or family history of thyroid cancer)[6]. Suspicious lymphadenopathy can be at times detected preoperatively using ultrasound. However, in approximately half of cases, LNM is noted intra-operatively or post-operatively on pathology and sometimes results in the need for completion surgery to remove the rest of the thyroid gland [33, 34].

Prognostic factors of PTMC have been previously explored, patients at high risk of recurrence are those with positive lymph node metastases [10, 28, 35,36,37], patients with hoarseness which signifies recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement [37], and tumor multifocality [10, 28]. Aggressive variants of PTC such as tall cell and hobnail may also be associated with recurrence and less favourable outcomes, but these features are difficult to identify preoperatively on FNAC and are usually reported after examination of the surgical pathology specimen. This study postulates that molecular testing for BRAF V600E can prove to be an important approach to identifying high-risk small thyroid nodules and therefore guide initial surgical management.

This study analyzed data from two groups of small thyroid nodules: PTMC (≤ 1 cm) and small PTC (1–1.5 cm). The two size categories were selected to follow up previous research in the field. Specifically, the study carried out by Tuttle et al. defined low risk PTC as nodules ≤ 1.5 cm in size and compared the pathologic characteristics of these two groups (≤ 1 cm) and (1–1.5) [38]. They found that tumor size at the time of diagnosis did not correlate to overall growth in diameter or total volume. In another study by Sakai et al., the inclusion criteria for active surveillance were expanded to T1bN0M0, meaning including nodules ≤ 2 cm with no nodal or distant metastases [39].

In this study, no significant difference was observed between these size groups in patient demographics (age, gender), MTNS, Bethesda score distribution, or incidence of BRAF V600E mutation. The BRAF V600E mutation was associated with aggressive tumour features in both PTMC (p = 0.011) and small PTC (p < 0.001). In the PTMC group, BRAF V600E tumours were found to have a significantly greater occurrence of tall cell variants (p = 0.031) and having greater than one aggressive feature (p = 0.012). In the small PTC group, BRAF V600E tumours had a significantly greater occurrence of lymph node metastases (p = 0.0016), tall cell variants (p = 0.0011), and greater than one aggressive feature (p = 0.0034).

Our findings demonstrate that BRAF V600E mutation is associated with aggressive disease in PTC ≤ 1.5 cm (risk ratio 2.81, CI 1.79–4.41). BRAF V600E mutated PTMC (risk ratio 2.80, CI 1.25–6.27) and small PTC (risk ratio 2.84, CI 1.67–4.81) were more likely to display aggressive features such as ETE, LNM, and high-risk histological variants.

This study had several limitations. As a single-center study taking place in urban Montreal, this study is subject to geographic selection bias. Future studies should include patients from multiple institutions. In addition, there is another selection bias since molecular testing for BRAF V600E performed for this study was paid for by the patient. Therefore, not all patients with PTC ≤ 1.5 cm had molecular testing performed. Also, the large majority of thyroid nodules ≤ 1.5 cm were not biopsied. As a result, more aggressive nodules which may be more likely to harbour a BRAF V600E mutation may be overrepresented in this series. This study only tested for the BRAF V600E mutation and did not control for other mutations. There is evidence suggesting other driver mutations in combination with other mutations including BRAF V600E, such as TP53 [40] and TERT mutations (41, 42), contribute even more to an aggressive tumour phenotype. Future studies should include these mutations into the analysis. Lastly, this study is limited by its retrospective nature. Disease recurrence data was not included in this study as there was no patient follow-up, however, future studies looking at this study’s population may be studied in the future to determine recurrence rates, additional treatment required versus resolution.

Conclusion

In this study, BRAF V600E mutation was associated with aggressive disease in small papillary thyroid carcinoma ≤ 1.5 cm and papillary thyroid microcarcinoma ≤ 1 cm, defined by: ETE, LNM, and high-risk histological variants (tall cell, columnar, solid/trabecular, diffuse sclerosing). The findings demonstrate the importance of molecular testing for the BRAF V600E mutation in PTMC and small PTC. Molecular testing can help guide therapeutic decision-making and identify high risk PTMC and small PTC that require surgical intervention over clinical monitoring.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article (and its additional files).

Abbreviations

ATA:

American Thyroid Association

ETE:

Extra-thyroidal extension

FNAC:

Fine needle aspiration cytology

LNM:

Lymph node metastasis

MTNS:

McGill Thyroid Nodule Score

PTC:

Papillary thyroid carcinoma

PTMC:

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

wt :

Wild-type

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2017. Bethesda, MD; 2020.

  2. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee. Canadian cancer statistics 2019. Toronto; 2019.

  3. Enewold L, Zhu K, Ron E, Marrogi AJ, Stojadinovic A, Peoples GE, et al. Rising thyroid cancer incidence in the United States by demographic and tumor characteristics, 1980–2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(3):784–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu X, Yao J, Tian W. Microarray technology to investigate genes associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(5):3729–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bomeli SR, LeBeau SO, Ferris RL. Evaluation of a thyroid nodule. Vol. 43, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. NIH Public Access; 2010. p. 229–38.

  6. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. 4th ed. Vol. 10.

  8. Davies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(4):317–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pusztaszeri MP, Tamilia M, Payne RJ. Active surveillance for low-risk small papillary thyroid cancer in North American countries: past, present and future (bridging the gap between North American and Asian practices). Gland Surg. 2020;9:1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roti E, degli Uberti EC, Bondanelli M, Braverman LE. Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. BioScientifica; 2008. 159, 659–73.

  11. Xing M. BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12:245–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417(6892):949–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lupi C, Giannini R, Ugolini C, Proietti A, Berti P, Minuto M, et al. Extensive clinical experience: Association of BRAF V600E mutation with poor clinicopathological outcomes in 500 consecutive cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(11):4085–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elisei R, Ugolini C, Viola D, Lupi C, Biagini A, Giannini R, et al. BRAFV600E mutation and outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: A 15-year median follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(10):3943–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X, Yan K, Lin X, Zhao L, An W, Wang C, et al. The association between BRAF V600E mutation and pathological features in PTC. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2014;271(11):3041–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JH, Lee ES, Kim YS. Clinicopathologic significance of BRAF V600E mutation in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2007;110(1):38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xing M, Westra WH, Tufano RP, Cohen Y, Rosenbaum E, Rhoden KJ, et al. BRAF mutation predicts a poorer clinical prognosis for papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(12):6373–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B. 1988;37(2):785–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li C, Lee KC, Schneider EB, Zeiger MA. BRAF V600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(12):4559–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Biron VL, Matkin A, Kostiuk M, Williams J, Cote DW, Harris J, et al. Analytic and clinical validity of thyroid nodule mutational profiling using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2018;47(1).

  21. Adeniran AJ, Zhu Z, Gandhi M, Steward DL, Fidler JP, Giordano TJ, et al. Correlation between genetic alterations and microscopic features, clinical manifestations, and prognostic characteristics of thyroid papillary carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(2):216–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Y, Sadow PM, Suh H, Lee KE, Choi JY, Suh YJ, et al. BRAFV600E is correlated with recurrence of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a systematic review, multi-institutional primary data analysis, and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2016;26(2):248–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim TH, Park YJ, Lim JA, Ahn HY, Lee EK, Lee YJ, et al. The association of the BRAFV600E mutation with prognostic factors and poor clinical outcome in papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2012;118(7):1764–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mercer KE, Pritchard CA. Raf proteins and cancer: B-Raf is identified as a mutational target. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Rev Cancer. 2003;1653:25–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen Y, Xing M, Mambo E, Guo Z, Wu G, Trink B, et al. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(8):625–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nikiforova MN, Kimura ET, Gandhi M, Biddinger PW, Knauf JA, Basolo F, et al. BRAF mutations in thyroid tumors are restricted to papillary carcinomas and anaplastic or poorly differentiated carcinomas arising from papillary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5399–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Namba H, Nakashima M, Hayashi T, Hayashida N, Maeda S, Rogounovitch TI, et al. Clinical implication of hot spot BRAF mutation, V599E, in papillary thyroid cancers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(9):4393–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang F, Yu X, Shen X, Zhu G, Huang Y, Liu R, et al. The prognostic value of tumor multifocality in clinical outcomes of papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(9):3241–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim KJ, Kim SG, Tan J, Shen X, Viola D, Elisei R, et al. BRAF V600E status may facilitate decision-making on active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2020;124:161–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, Kobayashi K, Miya A. Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation. Thyroid. 2014;24(1):27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugitani I, Toda K, Yamada K, Yamamoto N, Ikenaga M, Fujimoto Y. Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J Surg. 2010;34(6):1222–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu XM, Wan Y, Sippel RS, Chen H. Should all papillary thyroid microcarcinomas be aggressively treated? An analysis of 18,445 cases. Ann Surg; 2011. 653–60.

  33. Leboulleux S, Girard E, Rose M, Travagli JP, Sabbah N, Caillou B, et al. Ultrasound criteria of malignancy for cervical lymph nodes in patients followed up for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(9):3590–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Guerra A, Fugazzola L, Marotta V, Cirillo M, Rossi S, Cirello V, et al. A high percentage of BRAFV600E alleles in papillary thyroid carcinoma predicts a poorer outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(7):2333–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hay ID, Hutchinson ME, Gonzalez-Losada T, McIver B, Reinalda ME, Grant CS, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period. Surgery. 2008;144(6):980–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pellegriti G, Scollo C, Lumera G, Regalbuto C, Vigneri R, Belfiore A. Clinical behavior and outcome of papillary thyroid cancers smaller than 1.5 cm in diameter: study of 299 cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(8):3713–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sugitani I, Fujimoto Y. Symptomatic versus asymptomatic papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome and prognostic factors. Endocr J. 1999;46(1):209–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tuttle RM, Fagin JA, Minkowitz G, Wong RJ, Roman B, Patel S, et al. Natural history and tumor volume kinetics of papillary thyroid cancers during active surveillance. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(10):1015–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sakai T, Sugitani I, Ebina A, Fukuoka O, Toda K, Mitani H, et al. Active surveillance for T1bN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2019;29(1):59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nikiforova MN, Wald AI, Roy S, Durso MB, Nikiforov YE. Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (ThyroSeq) for detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(11):E1852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu X, Bishop J, Shan Y, Pai S, Liu D, Murugan AK, et al. Highly prevalent TERT promoter mutations in aggressive thyroid cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20(4):603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Melo M, Da Rocha AG, Vinagre J, Batista R, Peixoto J, Tavares C, et al. TERT promoter mutations are a major indicator of poor outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):E754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No sources of funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jennifer A. Silver, Mariya Bogatchenko, Marc Pusztaszeri, Véronique-Isabelle Forest, Michael P. Hier, Ji Wei Yang, Michael Tamilia & Richard J. Payne

  2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada

    Jennifer A. Silver, Michael P. Hier & Richard J. Payne

  3. Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Marc Pusztaszeri & Michael Tamilia

  4. Division of Endocrinology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Véronique-Isabelle Forest & Ji Wei Yang

  5. Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Marc Pusztaszeri, Véronique-Isabelle Forest, Michael P. Hier, Ji Wei Yang, Michael Tamilia & Richard J. Payne

Authors
  1. Jennifer A. Silver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariya Bogatchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Pusztaszeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Véronique-Isabelle Forest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael P. Hier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ji Wei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael Tamilia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Richard J. Payne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The original idea and study were designed by RP. JS and MB were responsible for creating and completing the database. The original manuscript was written by JS and MB and was reviewed and approved by all authors. JS, MB, RP, MP, VF, MH, JY, and MT all made valuable contributions and changes to the manuscript leading to its completion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Payne.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study 2020–2243 was approved by the Medical-Bioethics Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Integrated Health and Social Services Network for West-Central Montreal.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No competing financial or non-financial interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Appendix 1: Full data set of 121 patients included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silver, J.A., Bogatchenko, M., Pusztaszeri, M. et al. BRAF V600E mutation is associated with aggressive features in papillary thyroid carcinomas ≤ 1.5 cm. J of Otolaryngol - Head & Neck Surg 50, 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00543-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00543-9

Keywords

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery

ISSN: 1916-0216

Contact us